This article from the NY times
tells about the experience of a gastronomy expert who visits Holland. It tells
a lot about the way in which Holland, and especially the ‘Dutch cuisine’ are
seen in the world. Especially the first two paragraphs show that Holland is
said to be very far behind other European countries with regards to cooks and
cooking. There is no real Dutch identity in high cuisine. Very striking is the
passage ‘’ There were a few
Michelin stars spread around the city, but those spots were, and remain, pricey
and formal marathons of punctilious service and rich sauces.’’ This article
illustrates how hard it has been last years for Dutch cooks, like Jonnie Boer
to obtain a serious place among world’s best chefs. But it also shows that
foreigners do not really take Holland seriously with regards to high end
cuisine. Of course this is an American article so there will be a difference
with for example a German article, but still, it is striking in what way
Holland has been seen last few years. A passage illustrating the opinion on
Dutch cuisine: ‘’ One of the more ubiquitous dinners here is stamppot, which
is potatoes and vegetables, mashed and boiled in a pot, with some kind of meat
tossed in.’’
Luckily there is a positive
part in the article as well. The writer states that the Dutch cuisine and the
top segment of cooks has improved enormously recently. Of course this
improvements are illustrated by the price of ‘Purest’ as best cook book in the world.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/dining/putting-pizazz-back-on-amsterdams-menus.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten